- 1. Topband: ANC-4 and MFJ-1026 Comparison (score: 1)
- Author: Markus Hansen <mkve7ca@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:23:42 -0800
- During the last six months I have been comparing the relative effectiveness of the ANC-4 and MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellers. I built a simple relay operated switching circuit so I could instantly change f
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00129.html (6,873 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: ANC-4 and MFJ-1026 Comparison (score: 1)
- Author: w2pm@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:05:45 -0500
- Nice work and good comparisons. However I think it's important to note that noise nulling effectiveness is subject to local conditions which encorporate TONS of variables, and variables of variables.
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00130.html (9,548 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: ANC-4 and MFJ-1026 Comparison (score: 1)
- Author: Markus Hansen <mkve7ca@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:35:36 -0800
- Hi Peter: Thank your for response regarding the ANC-4 and MFJ-1026. You made a very good point and something we should never over look, (I will make it clearler on my web site) about TONS of variable
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00167.html (11,870 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: ANC-4 and MFJ-1026 Comparison (score: 1)
- Author: Markus Hansen <mkve7ca@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:15:50 -0800
- Tadek, SP7HT has asked me to share with the TOPBAND group his experience with the ANC-4 and MFJ-1026. I quote below his email message: "For years I am competing with local noises using ANC-4 (firstly
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00187.html (8,690 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: ANC-4 and MFJ-1026 Comparison (score: 1)
- Author: w2pm@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:29:34 -0500
- Ive done something similar here by adding an MFJ 959C Preamp/Antenna Tuner. It's a nice preamp with ability to bypass, a simple L tuner with tunable inductance and C, a gain control for the preamp, b
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00197.html (10,035 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu