Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+AK\s+in\s+160M\s+CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+AK\s+in\s+160M\s+CW\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: AK in 160M CW (score: 1): Author: "Magoo" <magoo@isp.ca>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:08:02 -0500; Not this year, but in the contests from 1997-2000 I did work AK...at my location he showed up at about 0730 and also about 1030, sometimes with really good signals. Unfortunately, the op who most oft; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00309.html (6,824 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: AK in 160M CW (score: 1): Author: Steve Lawrence <smlx@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:45:18 -0800; A check of the DX Summit search feature shows KL7J active on 160m through all of last year. 73, Steve WB6RSE _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.co; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00311.html (6,754 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: AK in 160M CW (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:39:35 -0500; I looked in W4AN's 160WW log, and he worked at least one KL7 because it shows up in the multipliers. Probably the aurora hurt northern stations trying to work KL7 in the contest this year. I think th; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00312.html (7,403 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]