Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+A\s+word\s+from\s+the\s+master\s+W1BB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+A\s+word\s+from\s+the\s+master\s+W1BB\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: A word from the master W1BB (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 22:46:58 -0500; Hi Steve, We have to be careful with models because they treat the earth as a homogeneous media, rather that what it really is. I'd rely more on actual measurements than models if the wires are close; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00005.html (7,827 bytes)
2. Topband: A word from the master W1BB (score: 1): Author: sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 03:18:56 +0000; G'day Goose/Tom W8JI and all, I guess when Stew Perry was writing this, there was a lot less readily available data on earth systems than there is today. As you say, we now know that a radial system; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00000.html (7,512 bytes)
3. Topband: A word from the master W1BB (score: 1): Author: sire@iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:08:30 +0800; G'day all, This year I had a clear-out of some old magazines and went carefully through them, looking for nuggets of 1.8MHz information. One of the best pieces I found came from a Bill Orr W6SAI 'Ant; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00197.html (9,243 bytes)
4. Topband: A word from the master W1BB (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:32:45 -0400; It is well known and documented (like in the Brown Lewis and Epstein study at RCA) with 1/4 wl radials, efficiency is nearly 100% with only 50-60 radials. Once efficiency is near 100%, very little c; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00201.html (8,490 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]