Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+A\s+wee\s+bit\s+more\s+on\s+power\s+coupling\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+A\s+wee\s+bit\s+more\s+on\s+power\s+coupling\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1): Author: bobnm7m@cnw.com (Robert Brown); Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 08:19:46 -0700 (PDT); Friends in Radio Land - There seems to be some confusion about insertion loss from power coupling of antennas across the USA. So I list below principal features for verticals for the four corners of; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00072.html (8,371 bytes)
2. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 22:17:36 -0400; Horizontal dipoles (and Inverted Vee Dipoles also) only have a perfectly horizontal polarization directly broadside to the antenna. The polarization gradually tilts, and reaches vertical directly of; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00077.html (8,167 bytes)
3. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1): Author: Robert Brown <bobnm7m@cnw.com> (Robert Brown); Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 21:18:10 -0700 (PDT); Tom, No, that is not what I said nor meant; there was no mention of a vertically polarized signal with the same ERP. The -24 dB insertion loss or power coupling is the result of a horizontally polari; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00078.html (8,576 bytes)
4. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 07:51:32 -0400; Well then, I guess I share Tom's confusion. You did state that verticals would be the antennas of choice in NA and EU, based on the amount of insertion loss for a dipole. It seems reasonable to ask,; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00079.html (8,696 bytes)
5. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 14:44:13 +0100; would be the antennas of choice in NA and EU, based on the amount of insertion loss for a dipole. It seems reasonable to ask, "-24 dB compared to what?" Or asking the question the other way round, wh; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00080.html (9,385 bytes)
6. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1): Author: Robert Brown <bobnm7m@cnw.com> (Robert Brown); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 08:08:10 -0700 (PDT); Pete, No, you are confused, indeed. My remark about verticals was related to THEIR low insertion loss to the north. I made no mention of dipoles in the original comparisons for verticals in NA and EU; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00081.html (8,711 bytes)
7. Topband: A wee bit more on power coupling (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 23:03:44 -0400; Hi Bob I asked: Then what are you saying? Below it sounds like you are saying the coupling would be worse, and so the dipole would have added attenuation to the tune of almost 24dB compared to a vert; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00092.html (8,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]