Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+9M0L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+9M0L\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: "Mike Greenway" <K4PI@BELLSOUTH.NET>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:37:15 -0400; We will pick up NA around 1826 today and will transmit 1811 after our SS 1033U TC. We worked 100 EUs but very few NA. Please forward this message to Top Band Archives for US Top Banders. Joe JA1LZR S; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00118.html (6,174 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:11:31 -0400; Great! Yet Another Pacific DX-pedition that comes on TB 30 minutes after my sunrise in the Eastern Caribbean. I lost even a chance for 4 new ones this season because of the operators in the Pacific D; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00122.html (7,794 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:34:17 -0600; Herb, You simply have no common darkness with 9M0L this time of year. KV4 sunrise: 1002Z 9M0L sunset: 1033Z KV4 sunset: 2236Z 9M0L sunrise: 2211Z What do you want them to do ? Change the declination; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00123.html (8,597 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:38:54 -0500; If you look at the map you will discover there are no times of common darkness between 9M0 and the Virgin Islands. There isn't even any common darkness hours between Alabama and 9M0, although there i; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00124.html (7,251 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:53:00 +1200; 30 minutes of daylight overlap is not too much, and there should be a really good chance of a contact. I agree with Herb, starting at 1010z instead of bang on their SS at 1033z, would give him a real; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00125.html (9,139 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: KL7RA <richkl7ra@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:04:49 -0400; I guess you don't want to hear my "complaining" about common darkness on topband. 73 Rich KL7RA Alaska _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00126.html (7,822 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:13:56 -0400; Steve, In all due respects: Common twilight is great for 160 meter DX especially over the SSW path wherein the path hugs the Greyline. In fact there are very excellent peaks during this short window.; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00127.html (10,165 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:27:07 -0600; Sorry, Herb. Your VK6HD counterexample doesn't quite cut it: VH6HD sunset: 0953Z : 9 minutes of common darkness ("twilight") 9M0L sunset: 1033Z : -31 minutes of common darkness ("full sun") I hope th; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00128.html (10,439 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:33:19 -0400; I agree that the opportunity is there if you can convince the other end to start early. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00129.html (10,671 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:04:55 -0800; There are chances but it's small. All expeditions who are claiming to want to exploit 160 only really need to at least be QRV at their Grey lines, plus and minus 20 minutes, and anything else possibl; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00130.html (11,492 bytes)
11. Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: Dan Edward Dba East edwards <dan.n.edwards@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:30:23 -0700 (PDT); wow, the op on 160m is doing a < GREAT > job... not sending too fast...listening carefully...not quitting...looking for stateside at the right time... pretty good signal this a.m. in north east texas; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00136.html (7,654 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:36:18 -0600; Good for you, Dan - I could barely hear him out here in s/w Utah this morning but I was super excited to hear 'em with my little 40', top loaded vertical! With only 20 watts maximum output and all of; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00138.html (8,490 bytes)
13. Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: <allan1@dejazzd.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:09:13 -0400; I now that 9M0L is The Spratly Isands, but is that the same Spratly Islands as Thanks, Allan W2TN _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK; /archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00099.html (6,328 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: 9M0L (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:50:18 -0400; The Spratly Islands are claimed by several countries. The appropriate call sign would be by the country that issues the license for that entity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spratly_Islands_dispute H; /archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00102.html (6,944 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]