Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+60\'\s+or\s+70\'\s+spacing\s+on\s+Hi\-Z\s+4\/8\s+element\s+RX\s+array\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 60' or 70' spacing on Hi-Z 4/8 element RX array (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:29:41 -0400
I just purchased a HiZ 8 element array ... and am trying to decide which way I want to go. I want a bit better performance on 40 than the standard 80 spacing provides (lobes are quite high angled) ..
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00000.html (7,356 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: 60' or 70' spacing on Hi-Z 4/8 element RX array (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 17:19:38 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Gary We plan to set up ours with 60' spacing for best 40m performance, and with just 10' elements.. When it is done we will be able to compare the performance on 80 and 160 with our monoband 8 cir
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00001.html (9,977 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: 60' or 70' spacing on Hi-Z 4/8 element RX array (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:26:16 -0400
Thanks Bob, 70 is what Lee use to offer ... I had a 4 sq with those dimensions (it was stolen out of a self storage unit however). I believe Lee would do cabling for either 70 or 60. My main focus is
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00002.html (10,785 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: 60' or 70' spacing on Hi-Z 4/8 element RX array (score: 1)
Author: Lee STRAHAN <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 00:39:24 +0000
Gary and others, As I said losing 6 dB + on the 4-8 Pro by going to the smaller diameter array down to 84.84 feet in diameter will be no problem whatsoever. There are still many users using the array
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00008.html (11,072 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: 60' or 70' spacing on Hi-Z 4/8 element RX array (score: 1)
Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 20:45:10 -0400
Hi Lee, Alright - I'm convinced then. I'll do the 60'! Thanks Gary Gary and others, As I said losing 6 dB + on the 4-8 Pro by going to the smaller diameter array down to 84.84 feet in diameter will b
/archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00009.html (11,706 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu