Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+400\s+Ft\.\s+RG6\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+400\s+Ft\.\s+RG6\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 400 Ft. RG6 (score: 1): Author: Ed Stallman <n5blz@teleshare.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:38:21 -0600; I'm wanting to do a beverage on 160 and was wondering if 400 Ft. of RG6 is to long? will I need a preamp? Tnx Ed N5BLZ _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@con; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00118.html (6,169 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 400 Ft. RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:03:06 -0800; No, it is certainly not too long. Coax has very low loss at the frequencies where we use Beverages. Not to make up loss in the coax, but maybe to match levels with your transmit antenna to make switc; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00119.html (7,491 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 400 Ft. RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@k8nd.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:47:29 -0500; I've always found that inserting a 20 dB (or so) attenuator in the TX antenna when receiving to be a better way to match signal levels to the RX antennas. I've never found a preamp necessary (althou; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00120.html (8,243 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 400 Ft. RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Harold Smith" <w0rihps@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:30:44 -0600; Ed, I don't think that you have to worry about the losses in that length of RG6. It will be so low that you will not notice it. 73 Price W0RI _______________________________________________ Topband; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00121.html (7,504 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 400 Ft. RG6 (score: 1): Author: Jon Zaimes AA1K <jz73@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:25:28 -0500; Ed, I once had a half mile of feedline, a few hundred feet of it RG6 and the rest 1/2 and 3/4 inch CATV hardline, and found I did not need a preamp. Also piggybacked some DC voltages down the line fo; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00122.html (7,361 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: 400 Ft. RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:24:11 -0500; to long? will I need a preamp? As others have said, no, that's not too long. I use 1000' runs of RG6 for some of my Beverage antennas. I later started using RG11, only because I bought a bunch (10,0; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00123.html (7,449 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 400 Ft. RG6 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:27:06 -0500; I have feedlines as long as 3000 feet and still amplify only in the house or barn. Not at the antenna. It's more than a matter of preference. Sometimes it is necessary, sometimes not. Depends on the; /archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00124.html (7,958 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]