Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+4\s+square\s+on\s+sidehill\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+4\s+square\s+on\s+sidehill\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 4 square on sidehill (score: 1): Author: Lew Sayre <w7ew@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:54:38 -0700; I'm pondering putting up a 4 square. An early problem would be the effect of having the bases of each element at a different elevation relative to each other. The QTH is on the top of a ridge so the; /archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00099.html (6,751 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 4 square on sidehill (score: 1): Author: Tom Vavra <wb8zrl@inavia.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:46:23 +0000; Lew DX Engineering says two things: "The system is forgiving, but the best front-to-back is obtained when symmetry is maintained and with each element resonant on the same frequency and with each ant; /archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00101.html (8,639 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 4 square on sidehill (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:32:40 -0700 (PDT); Lew, The first thing that comes to mind is putting them all on the same plane, and using an elevated radial system at the bottom of that plane. 73, Mike Waters www.w0btu.com _________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00103.html (7,891 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]