Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+4\s+new\s+radials\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+4\s+new\s+radials\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 4 new radials... (score: 1): Author: "Jim F." <j_fitton@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:12:39 -0800 (PST); I just measured the length of 4 two conductor cables the water Co. abandoned when they went to walk-by metering. My basement has access to cables running to 3 other condo basements which I will; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00082.html (7,249 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 4 new radials... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:22:11 -0800; At what frequency did you make that capacitance measurement, and how did you make it? When the frequency is high enough that the cable you are measuring is longer than about 1/20 wavelength (taking V; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00083.html (7,452 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 4 new radials... (score: 1): Author: <k3ky@radioprism.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:49:12 -0700; Hi, Jim Remember, when you transmit, those radials are radiating. Worst case, you might even get arcing from any unlucky voltage points along the 'radials' depending on power level and the actual len; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00085.html (7,263 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 4 new radials... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:03:39 -0800; Hi Jim, Yes, the variation with frequency that you saw was the transmission line behavior. I'd say that the 1 MHz numbers are good. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ UR RST; /archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00106.html (9,848 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]