Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+2004\s+ARRL\s+160M\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+2004\s+ARRL\s+160M\s+Contest\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 20:28:24 -0600; I have been asked to once again write the QST article and web page content for the ARRL 160M contest this coming weekend. (RULES) http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2004/160-Meters.html I'm told that; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00273.html (9,650 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "on4ww" <on4ww@pandora.be>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:21:30 +0100; Hi Ford and all, I think remembering we discussed what follows, after last year's event. To that regard, I already talked to ARRL people about this, but there was no interest. Haven't read this year'; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00282.html (11,750 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:23:08 -0600; For 75% of NA, your description is appropriate. Your comment is interpreted as having a virtual disdain for one of the most popular contests in NA (SS). As in any contest with multipliers, bagging 'n; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00289.html (11,098 bytes)
4. RE: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:48:48 -0700; My friend Mr. Peterson makes an interesting point which has a fairly obvious, though unacceptable, solution. Simply make the ARRL 160 meter contest a one band SS contest with the stipulation that DX; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00293.html (8,949 bytes)
5. RE: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "Ron Spencer" <ronspencer@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:54:05 -0500; I too understand EU station's frustration during the 160 contests. I usually look deep for DX because I just enjoy working them. Many, many times a strong NA station is calling CQ just a few hundred; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00294.html (7,976 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: Greg Weinfurtner <weinfurt@oak.cats.ohiou.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:55:38 -0500; On Nov 30, 2004, at 12:23 PM, Ford Peterson wrote: Tom wrote: I certainly agree with this Mark! The ARRL 160 is more of a domestic sweepstakes contest. 73, Tom W8JI Someone mentioned a great idea tha; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00295.html (8,649 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:58:41 -0600; ...snip... I would love to do the analysis. But it is not an option. The scores database is all I get to work with. No bifurcation of DX vs US/VE mults are provided (mults is mults as they say). The; /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00296.html (9,316 bytes)
8. Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: "on4ww" <on4ww@pandora.be>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:33:52 +0100; Thanks for the private and collective input. Let me close this topic with some final comments. Years ago when I first started contesting, I entered the ARRL10m contest with several goals : have fun,; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00023.html (9,190 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1): Author: Lew <Lew@dsl-only.net>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:10:17 -0800; Mark, you're right. 160M is a DX band. It wasn't considered that by the majority of hams until it became apparent that by good operating and good engineering, DX could be worked. A lot of people in t; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00024.html (7,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]