Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+inverted\s+vee\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+inverted\s+vee\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Topband: 160m inverted vee (score: 1): Author: "Richard Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 22:09:21 -0700; I put up a 160 meter inverted vee with the apex at 60 feet and the legs pulled out in a straight line far enough to get the ends up 15 or 20 feet. It was several S-units below my 90 foot vertical, e; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00106.html (7,663 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160m inverted vee (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:00:11 -0400; I would give the low dipole a try. At least it would get you on the air. People do work a lot of stuff with low dipoles. I've *rarely* observed cases where a low dipole (below 150 feet) is competiti; /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00109.html (8,488 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]