Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+contests\s+\-\s+what\s+do\s+you\s+want\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: sire at iinet.net.au (Steve Ireland)
Date: Sat Jan 25 08:48:05 2003
I think there is a bit more to Tom W8JI's posting than simply a compassionate gentleman-like one. The reality is that the disappearance of the DX window means that endangered species DX like myself h
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00212.html (9,036 bytes)

2. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: zl3ix at inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX)
Date: Sat Jan 25 16:24:21 2003
I would like to add my support to Steve's post. I am thoroughly enjoying this contest, simply because condx seem so good, BUT I have spent zero time CQ'ing, simply because I can't hold a frequency. W
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00215.html (8,007 bytes)

3. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: richard at karlquist.com (Richard Karlquist)
Date: Mon Jan 27 05:52:38 2003
Holding a CQ frequency is a big problem in W6 as well. Even with 1.5 KW and a decent antenna, I am constantly having to QSY when an east coast station fires up on top of me without a QRL? and procee
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00225.html (8,180 bytes)

4. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: ford at cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Mon Jan 27 11:16:12 2003
The CW 160M contest is one of my favorites. I didn't even work it this year. Why? Because from Minnesota, it's just another domestic contest with a twist. The twist is that the point structure is alr
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00230.html (8,709 bytes)

5. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: btippett at alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon Jan 27 11:23:55 2003
I'll probably regret doing this, but here goes anyway! "Under my view the 10 point for another continent QSO is not really fair when you compare continents with a large amount of stations, like NA an
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00231.html (10,024 bytes)

6. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: btippett at alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon Jan 27 15:43:25 2003
Here are a few additional questions from someone who sent me a private E-mail, which also touch on K8BHZ's comments: <Why do we insist on allowing USA-to-USA Qs in a dx contest, let alone in the dx w
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00240.html (9,598 bytes)

7. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: k9ay at k9ay.com (K9AY)
Date: Mon Jan 27 20:00:56 2003
-- I think the "no DX window" situation will sort itself out... My operating time was limited to 8-1/2 hours on the first night, but with a very modest station here in the alleged Black Hole of Wisc
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00245.html (7,939 bytes)

8. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 1)
Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 20:01:06 2003
I'd like to add my comments about the three "big" 160-meter DX contests - the areas of the world they favor, and their popularity. The first weekend of December each year is the ARRL 160m contest. Th
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00248.html (10,167 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu