Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+biological\s+effects\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160m\s+biological\s+effects\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m biological effects (score: 1): Author: df2py@t-online.de (DF2PY); Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:28:35 +0200; hello topbanders ! today Garry -NI6T- sent me a message and as usual the end quoted that 160 is an obsession.I found this to be true for all of my ham-friends on 160.As a medical professional i start; /archives//html/Topband/1999-10/msg00059.html (7,699 bytes)
2. Topband: 160m biological effects (score: 1): Author: k8unp@Shadow.net (Pete Rimmel); Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 11:48:16 -0700; Since the biological effects (that cause brain damage and cancer) due to RF are related to localized heating from the RF, I can't imagine a signal on 160 being concentrated enough to be a problem. I; /archives//html/Topband/1999-10/msg00063.html (7,174 bytes)
3. Topband: 160m biological effects (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 19:09:52 -0400; I built some equipment and worked with several researchers experimenting with effects of RF on animals and people. Dr. Art Pilla, who has been experimenting for many years, assured me there was nothi; /archives//html/Topband/1999-10/msg00070.html (7,531 bytes)
4. Topband: 160m biological effects (score: 1): Author: bogus@does.not.exist.com (); Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:20:34 -1000; And the need to "evaluate" our stations per the FCC/ARRL guide for EMR compatibility. However, it turns out to be a tiger with no teeth. By the time you account for mode duty cycle, and the time tra; /archives//html/Topband/1999-10/msg00074.html (7,432 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]