Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+Inverted\-L\s+Radial\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+Inverted\-L\s+Radial\s+Question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160M Inverted-L Radial Question (score: 1): Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:33:54 -0400; I've been doing some reading on elevated radials for Inverted-L antennas. The existing literature seems to fall into two types; ground radials where the feed point is very close the ground, and syste; /archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00115.html (7,904 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160M Inverted-L Radial Question (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:37:07 -0400 (EDT); Hi Mark, The sloping radials you're proposing to use also have the affect of shortening the effective length of your vertical, just as if you had raised the feed point. 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original Mes; /archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00116.html (8,082 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160M Inverted-L Radial Question (score: 1): Author: Bob Kupps via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:16:56 +0000 (UTC); Here is a great reference for you Mark - Antennas By N6LF Antennas By N6LF Antenna design ideas for radio amateurs by Rudy Severns N6LF | | From: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com> To: topBand List <t; /archives//html/Topband/2016-09/msg00117.html (8,517 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]