Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+EWE\s+Problems\s+Part\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160M\s+EWE\s+Problems\s+Part\s+2\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160M EWE Problems Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:32:03 -0500; Good Morning! Last night was the second night in a row with nice conditions between the east coast and Europe on 160M. I took the time to get a cup of coffee and spend a few hours comparing the Inver; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00483.html (9,446 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160M EWE Problems Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Art Snapper <art@nk8x.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:53:53 -0500; Hi Mark, I would be curious if you are getting a significant S-Meter reading using the external preamp and testing with the antenna disconnected from the cable? If so, my guess would be that the Ewe; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00484.html (10,766 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160M EWE Problems Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 14:33:11 -0500; Hi Mark, I modeled your antenna last night, and have some comments. There is almost as much reactance as resistance at the feedpoint of your EWE based on your dimensions and termination resistor, but; /archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00488.html (15,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]