Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+receivers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+receivers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 receivers (score: 1): Author: altdx@worldnet.att.net (John Harden, D.M.D.); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 06:52:16 -0400; Dear All, It's been interesting to hear all of the comments on receivers for 160. Unless you have the technical know-how that people like W8JI and others have, and can modify an R4-C, your best bet i; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00095.html (7,452 bytes)
2. Topband: 160 receivers (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:06:48 EDT; It is important to note however, that the stock Omni VI+ is hampered by limited dynamic range. W8JI clearly spelled out the requirement for robust dynamic range (in an earlier post), where single hop; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00097.html (7,405 bytes)
3. Topband: 160 receivers (score: 1): Author: alwilliams@olywa.net (Al Williams); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:32:38 -0700; More explanation desired-- Section 4-8 of the TenTEC Omni6+ manual begins "The phase noise characteristics of the OMNI VI depend entirely on the design of the 5,0 - 5.5 MHz synthesizer. The synthesiz; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00099.html (7,625 bytes)
4. Topband: 160 receivers (score: 1): Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham); Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 00:14:35 +0000; K7PUC said about the Omni-6+: More explanation desired I had the -6 & imagine the -6+ is the same. The LO is crystal based, so not much phase noise contribution from there. The VFO is synthesized, bu; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00111.html (7,854 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]