Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+meter\s+antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+meter\s+antennas\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 meter antennas (score: 1): Author: altdx@worldnet.att.net (Dr. John Harden); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 09:07:05 -0500; Dear Gang, Always enjoy listening to the talk about various and sundry 160 meter antennas. I am limited to a one-acre city lot here in Atlanta. My lot is basically 360 feet by 150 feet. My house sits; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00040.html (7,705 bytes)
2. Topband: 160 meter antennas (score: 1): Author: k3ky@erols.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:56:24 +0000; I had a similar experience with a "U"-type antenna on 160m, one big difference being that the horizontal length of mine was 140ft instead of 100ft. At one time, I had an 80m half square up- about 68-; /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00048.html (8,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]