Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+meter\s+DX\s+window\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+meter\s+DX\s+window\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 meter DX window question (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:19:03 EDT; Gentlemen, I'm sure most of you are very experienced, much more then a green horn such as myself. So I hope you can answer a question for me 1.830-1.835MHz is suppose to be a DX window, right? So I'm; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00011.html (8,542 bytes)
2. Topband: 160 meter DX window question (score: 1): Author: stcohen@erols.com (Susan and Ted Cohen); Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 16:42:31 -0400; Paul raises an interesting point. I have had two very heated "discussions" with SSB stations on 1835 kHz. In an attempt to move them higher in the band, they questioned the existance of a DX window.; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00015.html (7,680 bytes)
3. Topband: 160 meter DX window question (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:40:45 -0500; I agree with W1BB's and K6SE's feeling about the DX window: I would think that the majority of the stateside stations agree with this. I'm curious as to what the prevailing thought in European is. I; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00024.html (8,029 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]