Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+activity\s+night\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+activity\s+night\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 activity night (score: 1): Author: Tom Boucher <tomg3olb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:06:02 +0000; Sorry guys, I thought I posted the following about a month ago. Must be a long delay echo on the 160 reflector! Tom G3OLB Just to say that I wholeheartedly endorse Roger's comments on repeat 160 metr; /archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00164.html (7,129 bytes)
2. Topband: 160 activity night (score: 1): Author: Ron Spencer via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 12:19:40 -0400; I enjoy low band dxing and contesting. And have an above average set up. All that said, I get on when I want.....or not. Last I checked ham radio is still a hobby not an obligation. Re FT8: My only g; /archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00063.html (7,042 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160 activity night (score: 1): Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 22:32:48 +0200; In Region 1 there is no 160m band above 1900 for most countries. 1840 is a good place, it only takes 2.5kHz of spectrum. Anyway as there are no cw stations at all most of the 160m band is not used mo; /archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00070.html (8,092 bytes)
4. Re: Topband: 160 activity night (score: 1): Author: Mail 10 <mail10@barefoothorse.com.au>; Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 10:40:28 +1100; I rarely see CW activity much above 1830 kHz. The only issue I see from time to time is SSB interference to the 1840 kHz FT8 channel. VK band is 1800 - 1875 kHz. If a particular mode were moved above; /archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00076.html (8,162 bytes)
5. Re: Topband: 160 activity night (score: 1): Author: "weaverwf@usermail.com" <weaverwf@usermail.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 21:34:40 -0400; That plus the bandwidth of 160M antennas were probably taken into account in the decision to put it at 1.840. Moving the FT8 frequency much higher would shut a lot of the CW guys that like both modes; /archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00079.html (8,594 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]