- 1. Topband: 160 Rrceiving (score: 1)
- Author: "ken" <barbiekenw@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:48:28 -0500
- Thanks for the responses. Some off line, not everyone is crazy about it - as expected. (I am considering the ARAV-4P version -- I really don't want to face the effort for a full scale T/R setup since
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-06/msg00043.html (6,874 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: 160 Rrceiving (score: 1)
- Author: "George \(K8GG\) & Marijke Guerin" <gmguerin@voyager.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:05:05 -0400
- (Refering to a DX Engineering receiving 4-square) Thanks for the responses. Some off line, not everyone is crazy about it - as expected. (I am considering the ARAV-4P version -- I really don't want t
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-06/msg00044.html (7,759 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: 160 Rrceiving (score: 1)
- Author: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:06:50 -0700
- OM Ken & fellow Topbanders, I would not sell a 480 foot Beverage short. They work. Especially if covered with plastic insulation, the velocity factor is close to 10 percent vs. 5 percent for bare or
- /archives//html/Topband/2008-06/msg00049.html (7,369 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu