Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+M\s+FCP\s+Alternatives\s+\-\s+Comments\s+Invited\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+M\s+FCP\s+Alternatives\s+\-\s+Comments\s+Invited\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 M FCP Alternatives - Comments Invited (score: 1): Author: Rick ve3mm <richardstasiak@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:46:13 -0400; Hello I am planning a 160 M FCP and inverted L installation for the upcoming winter season. The space available for both the inverted L and FCP are limited and I have to make the installation neat to; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00210.html (7,543 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: 160 M FCP Alternatives - Comments Invited (score: 1): Author: "Jim F." <j_fitton@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:15:16 -0700 (PDT); Hi Rick, My FCP will be in the woods in trees with the 2 element leg visible and the 3 element side in the trees to keep down visibility. I will try these electric fence insulators mounted in tre; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00211.html (9,860 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: 160 M FCP Alternatives - Comments Invited (score: 1): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 22:01:19 -0400; A couple of things going on here. Loss to the ground from the FCP increases as you go lower. Do it as high as you can and "get away with it". That is something only you can figure out. Remember that; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00212.html (10,316 bytes)
4. Topband: 160 M FCP Alternatives - Comments Invited (score: 1): Author: Rick ve3mm <richardstasiak@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:38:37 -0400; Thanks to all who replied to my request for comments. All of the feedback is useful. I am now planning a FCP installation mounted on the fence, offset with PVC standoffs made from dimensioned PVC lum; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00248.html (8,013 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]