Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+DX\s+with\s+limited\s+resources\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\s+DX\s+with\s+limited\s+resources\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160 DX with limited resources (score: 1): Author: W9UCW@aol.com (W9UCW@aol.com); Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:46:32 EST; There's been a thread on the Reflector concerning working DX on 160 with less than optimum resources. Some folks seem disheartened faced with the successes of the "Big Guns." I don't think they shoul; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00251.html (11,295 bytes)
2. Topband: 160 DX with limited resources (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 07:16:12 -0500; All antennas work to some extent, if they are radiating. For example I have worked VK's that were mobile using 100 watts and small mobile antennas, and I have worked VK using the same. Does a well-c; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00253.html (7,754 bytes)
3. Topband: 160 DX with limited resources (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:47:18 -0500; Of course -- for evidence look no farther than N6BT's story about working WAC on 10 meters with an array of light bulbs on his deck rail.; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00255.html (7,023 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]