Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\/80\s+Meter\s+Vertical\s+Performance\s+Over\s+PoorSoilConductivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+160\/80\s+Meter\s+Vertical\s+Performance\s+Over\s+PoorSoilConductivity\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Topband: 160/80 Meter Vertical Performance Over PoorSoilConductivity (score: 1): Author: "Bob Tellefsen" <n6wg@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 21:15:15 -0800; Ron "I believe the conductivity is probably not that good. There appears to be only about 6 inches of soil on top of rock." Your situation sounds similar to a fellow who tried verticals in the desert; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00171.html (7,776 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]