Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+More\s+to\s+Orion\s+vs\s+Icom\s+756PRO\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+More\s+to\s+Orion\s+vs\s+Icom\s+756PRO\s+II\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: [TenTec] More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 11:58:06 -0500; Charlie W0YG omitted the IC-756PRO2's performance under identical conditions. Will be interesting to see Orion's BDR performance when ARRL's tests are published shortly... http://dayton.akorn.net/pip; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00176.html (6,760 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: [TenTec] More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1): Author: "jbattin" <jbattin@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:49:16 -0600; The Orion I measured was 13 db better than FT1000 and 25 db better than a Pro11 whan it came to high signal overload. These levels are very high and the difference would probabily not be noticed unle; /archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00180.html (8,161 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]