Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+Question\s+for\s+the\s+EXPERTS\s+and\s+Heavy\s+Transceiver\s+users\s+and\s+testers\]\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: [Fwd: Re: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers] (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@surfvi.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:33:41 -0400
Dennis, I replaced my aging Icom 765 with a 746 pro.....It was a great decision as this rig has a wonderful receiver and other super features, I did after a year loose the backlight but I was able to
/archives//html/Topband/2010-03/msg00161.html (8,836 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers] (score: 1)
Author: GEORGE WALLNER <gwallner@the-beach.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:47:52 -0400
Herb, While I have not done a formal side-by-side test of the two rigs, and I don't claim to be an expert, both HA7RY (Tomi) and I have used both rigs, side-by-side, on the 5K0T and VK9GMW DXpedition
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00003.html (9,192 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers] (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:01:08 -0400
The Sherwood RX listing is at http://www.sherweng.com/table.html The Kenwood 850 is on the list, but the 746 models are not evaluated. 73, Guy. _______________________________________________ UR RST
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00004.html (9,509 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers] (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:07:04 +0000
You might want to try turning off the K3's AGC under those condx, just as an experiment. In similar circumstances, I've found turning off AGC alleviates this "noise modulation" effect. 73, Barry N1EU
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00008.html (8,050 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers] (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:00:56 +0000 (UTC)
All, I've been enjoying this discussion of "non-competition-grade" transceivers. My base station radio is a K3 but I do lots of operating on the road and on trips and am looking for a small transceiv
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00011.html (10,107 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers] (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@surfvi.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:47:54 -0400
Mike, I remember Earl Cunningham, K6SE (SK) did a comparison between the K-2 and the Icom 746PRO and came to the conclusion that the Icom 746 Pro was a much better weak signal performer. At that time
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00019.html (10,410 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu