Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+At\s+least\s+four\s+more\s+years\s+of\s+solar\s+minimum\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+At\s+least\s+four\s+more\s+years\s+of\s+solar\s+minimum\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: [CQ-Contest] At least four more years of solar minimum? (score: 1): Author: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 11:39:32 -0500 (EST); Big question mark, we are heading to another sunspot minimum or quite possibly another Maunder - deeep cycles minimum, possibly lasting few cycles. Happened once in 1650 -1750. Maybe God answer to a; /archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00108.html (10,053 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: [CQ-Contest] At least four more years of solar minimum? (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 11:51:06 -0500 (EST); Hi Yuri, There are two types of forecasts... Lucky or wrong. 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original Message -- From: "Yuri Blanarovich" <k3bu@optimum.net> To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> Cc: donovan; /archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00111.html (9,690 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]