Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\?\s+Key\-clicks\s+FT1000MK\-V\s+field\s+\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "Wolfgang Wessely" <wessely@asamnet.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:02:23 +0100
Hi reflectees, I am one of the DL0AO-team... We are owner of a "FT1000MK-V field" and would like to prevent the key-clicks We found several modifikations in the WEB for the FT1000MP, but we are not s
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00202.html (6,566 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "john battin" <jbattin@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:24:51 -0600
Hi reflectees, I am one of the DL0AO-team... We are owner of a "FT1000MK-V field" and would like to prevent the key-clicks We found several modifikations in the WEB for the FT1000MP, but we are not s
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00203.html (8,259 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:21:03 -0500
We are owner of a "FT1000MK-V field" and would like to prevent the key-clicks We found several modifikations in the WEB for the FT1000MP, but we are not sure if they works for the "field". Any tipps
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00204.html (7,489 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:09:29 -0500
At 08:21 AM 1/18/2005, Tom Rauch wrote: ... The fixes for the MP will work in the Field, but before you do that why not ask Yaesu why we must wait years and years for them to correct something as sim
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00205.html (8,319 bytes)

5. Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:36:43 -0500
is like pushing on a rope. I'm sure Chip and the service guys are well aware of what needs to be done, but there's no bureaucracy like a Japanese bureaucracy, especially if you're trying to influence
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00206.html (8,142 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Kevin Stover" <rkstover@mchsi.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:15:50 -0600
P.S. It will be VERY interesting to see if the 9000 has keyclicks! And if it doesn't I would assume they've chosen to ignore the problem in the 1000MP family, and "fix" it in the 9000. It wouldn't be
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00208.html (8,570 bytes)

7. RE: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: zoltan.pitman@vodafone.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:07:51 +0100
During last year's Friedrichshafen hamfest I had the chance to talk to some senior RF developers (including the designer of FT-9000) of Yaesu in a closed tech meeting set up by HA0MM who is represen
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00209.html (7,980 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:07:09 +0000
Tom and all, I believe it's a business decision. CW operators are in a minority and 160 operators are evan a larger minority. Does it justify to spend effort on features which do not have growth pote
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00210.html (8,905 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:34:49 -0800
even behavior commitment Everyone who buys a Ten-Tec Orion or other alternative should mail Yaesu a copy of their sales invoice and a little note saying "this could have been yours, but since you do
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00211.html (9,653 bytes)

10. RE: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:58:12 -0500
HA1AG wrote: I can assure you they were well aware of the waveshaping issue as well as the corrections available in public domain. What still strikes me that new productions are not corrected but tha
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00216.html (11,723 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "john devoldere" <john.devoldere@pandora.be>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:05:45 -0000
There is only ONE solution to this problem of stubborn YEASY-engineers. Sell these YAESU's and get a radio that does NOT click. That is the main reason why I did away all my YEASU stuff and now run t
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00217.html (9,113 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "john devoldere" <john.devoldere@pandora.be>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:06:54 -0000
Wait until the YAESY guys read what I wrote in edition #4 of the Low Band Book.... will be available at Dayton. 73 to all John, ON4UN _______________________________________________ Topband mailing l
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00218.html (8,479 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: Augie Hansen <augie.hansen@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:49:24 -0700
Hi Bill, I believe that Yaesu won't make the needed changes for two related reasons: 1) Updating the design of current "in production" ft1000-class transceivers would be admitting that there is a pro
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00220.html (9,749 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:40:27 -0700
I find it hard to believe it's a business decision when they are designing a new radio and have a chance to "get it right" this time around since it only means another 5 or 10 cents worth of parts. A
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00224.html (9,449 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:52:33 -0500
It has NOT been the same there without JA1MP. -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu> To: <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 9:36 AM Subject: Topband
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00225.html (9,804 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: SteamBoilers@aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:54:48 EST
That is the main reason why I did away all my YAESU stuff and now run the ORION. Nobody since has ever complained about key clicks on my transmissions Spent thousands &pound; $ when the Mk5 first cam
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00229.html (8,329 bytes)

17. RE: Topband: ? Key-clicks FT1000MK-V field ? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <n1eu@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:56:15 -0500
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> This is what is so difficult for me to understand. What is the cost of a production change, which at the worst might be a new board layout and probably a fe
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00233.html (10,165 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu