Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\(no\s+subject\)\s*$/: 100 ]

Total 100 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:16:55 -0800
See N6LF's website about velocity factor and radials. Dunno about BOG. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00247.html (7,552 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@surfvi.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 07:08:44 -0400
Jeff W7JW asked: BOG's work and can be shorter but the overall signal pickup and gain is considerably less and a good pre- amp is very important. The ROG radials act more like a big capacitor to grou
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00250.html (7,874 bytes)

43. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Nm7m@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:08:10 EST
FOR THOSE INTERESTED IN LONG-HAUL DXING ON 160 VIA DUCTS, I'D SUGGEST READING THE ARTICLES THAT K9LA AND I PUBLISHED RECENTLY IN THE NOVEMBER, DECEMBER AND JANUARY ISSUES OF CQ AND THE LOW BAND MONIT
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00105.html (7,089 bytes)

44. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: radio@modesgate.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:43:06 -0800
So, having missed the opportunity to purchase the pneumatic mast:-( I enquired about on this list last week, I have been considering other alternatives. My problem is that, due to restrictions at my
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00186.html (8,046 bytes)

45. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Nm7m@aol.com
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:09:48 EDT
Friends in Radiol Now there's talk of raising one's QRG on 160 to 1.9 mHz to have less signal absorption while in pursuit of DX. But even with global agreement, life would not be simple as the geomag
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00093.html (7,737 bytes)

46. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Nm7m@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:01:43 EDT
Friends in Radioland, Earlier, i pointed out that galactic cosmic ray flux (GCR) is a good DX variable, with DX conditions improving when GCR decreases. Current GCR data is easily obtained from the M
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00094.html (6,969 bytes)

47. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Nm7m@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:11:52 EDT
Friends in Radioland, Earlier, I cited the fact that 160 DXing generally improves when the flux of galactic cosmic rays (GCR) DECREASES. This is shown on reviewing distance L vs GCR records in 160 me
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00095.html (7,771 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:30:43 -0500
Hmm. Do I need my tin foil hat to try this? Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topban
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00096.html (6,911 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:43:54 -1000
Not being a propagation expert and not wanting to throw cold water on the whole theory, but I would like to say that its a theory at best and not proven by analyzing enough data, in fact some of the
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00098.html (8,107 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:19:59 -0700
Hi Bob, I don't quite understand the relationship between SP5EWY's DX results to North America and rich soil on the banks of the Mississippi. Wouldn't good soil around the Mississippi only benefit a
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00099.html (8,138 bytes)

51. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Nm7m@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:11:20 EDT
Friends in Radioland In the empirical model, ducting comes first on a path and the F-component is at the end. So the Mississippi region favors signals from SP5EWY Sorry about the confusion, **Big sav
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00100.html (7,182 bytes)

52. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Nm7m@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:54:29 EDT
FRIENDS IN RADIOLAND In case you missed the Nov 2008 issue of CQ Magazine,, K9LA and I have a new theory for 160 DXing. It involves a new DX variable, galactic cosmic ray GCR intensity,' In a nutshel
/archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00098.html (6,474 bytes)

53. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: richard brossard <w2rlb@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Hello All , What is a center fed zepp as i believe there is no such antenna due to the fact that a zepp is an end fed long wire that got its name from a wire that was reeled out of a zepplane and end
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00207.html (7,053 bytes)

54. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Craig Clark" <jcclark@radiusnorth.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:45:18 -0500
I have often wondered (and never gotten an answer ) to the question "How does the forest affect the radiated signal?" Not enough that I would fret, worry or lose sleep over. I have almost 30 years of
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00064.html (6,742 bytes)

55. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: <rfoxwor1@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:15:32 -0500
Jim K9YC posted a message at 1337 LT on 5 November about "very deep QSB" on the TX3A signal, and I remembered the attached message that showed up just about 2 days ago on the IRCA reflector (a Medium
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00212.html (9,295 bytes)

56. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: K8LEEWMM@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:24:11 EST
Has any one tried the MTU,s for the ft-2000,s? interested in the one for 160. Your input and results are needed! wayne k8lee _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious ba
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00350.html (6,718 bytes)

57. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "w8uvz" <w8uvz@voyager.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:43:37 -0500
Top Band enthusiasts are cordially invited to the 21st annual Top Band Gathering on Friday evening of the 2010 Dayton Hamvention weekend. This annual event brings together 160 meter operators from ar
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00256.html (8,074 bytes)

58. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: K8LEEWMM@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:42:26 EST
Jo good day I have used the dx eng rx 4 square at PJ2T 12drg north and they work GREAT. Having said that I have found at my qth in IN. i can never have enough different 160 rx ants. one nite one will
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00140.html (6,741 bytes)

59. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Bolmar Aguilar <bolmaraguilar@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:07:52 -0400
I would like to know if I can simultaneously use an antenna beverage to be use in 160 and 80 meters. What disadvantages may occur?. TNX K4AMW , HK1MW, ex HK1AMW ______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00077.html (6,262 bytes)

60. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:37:45 -0700
Just want to remind y'all that the QRP ARCI Organization's Top Band Sprint is scheduled from 0000Z to 0600Z on 2 December 2011. Note: start time is in the evening of 1 December 2011 in North America.
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00097.html (7,995 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu