Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/: 100 ]

Total 100 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:35:27 -0700 (PDT); I used to use DC on the coax to control my beverages. As Tom says, if you get any water in the connectors, or in the coax because a critter chewed on it, the noise will be S9+. If you do not have DC; /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00074.html (8,215 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: F3WT <ars.f3wt@wanadoo.fr>; Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:43:04 +0200; Hi all, Hi Bjoern ( SM0MDG) I have mounted Cornelius's 15M pole with 2 Delta-loops allmost in parallel ... Well not quite: ... the 4 wires drop down from the apex topping 22M high to form sort of a p; /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00079.html (9,412 bytes)
23. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "David Raymond" <earlham@radiks.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:07:12 -0500; Topband seems to always hold surprises. For the past two or three years I've listened for Ross, 9M2AX, but never heard any sign of him (not even a ping). This morning he was 449 amidst some late summ; /archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00059.html (7,135 bytes)
24. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:41:04 -0500; "An interesting -- and very easy to overlook! -- reference in ON4UN's latest lowband bible in the matter of ground radials... Specifically, wire laid atop the ground may be considered to have a velo; /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00100.html (7,214 bytes)
25. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: calle.jonsson@sverige.nu; Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:52:10 +0100 (CET); I have been using different vertical arrangements on 80 and 160 for 20 years and at times had up to 75 cm of snow covering feedpoints. Radials have been rolled out on ground. No noticeable effect at; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00020.html (6,469 bytes)
26. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: bobk8ia@aol.com; Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:45:29 -0500; where there is little or no soil, just bare rock. I have seen references to using the K9AY over rocky ground using 4 radials laid out on the ground. What kind of performance should I expect in a sit; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00089.html (8,107 bytes)
27. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:51:00 -0800 (PST); <We hoped the SDR-1000 band display would, as another operator claimed, give Mark B the advantage of "seeing pileups" when new stations or multipliers arrived on the band. Unfortunately we learned i; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00138.html (12,673 bytes)
28. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:00:09 -0500; Lee, You are trying to debate a fact everyone agrees on and that I already clearly stated. Why? It is a radio, not a president or religion, that we are discussing. It is what it is. 73 Tom _________; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00142.html (8,167 bytes)
29. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:18:40 -0800; It wasn't clear to me from Tom's post that the $40K FFT analyzer was any better than the SDR-1000 in terms of dynamic range. I think he just said that the $40K FFT analyzer was equally useful (or use; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00143.html (8,802 bytes)
30. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Lee A Crocker <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:51:16 -0800 (PST); "It is what it is." Quite rightly put. And the rest is just opinion. 73 W9OY ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving abo; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00146.html (7,141 bytes)
31. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: gm4fam@tiscali.co.uk; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:31:12 +0000; Greetings all I too have a beverage running through woods. It is 860ft long pointing to NA. Performance is excellent - BUT as Eddy VE3CUI mentioned, it is very easy to get disoriented when trying to; /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00235.html (7,778 bytes)
32. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: barockteer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:33:12 -0400; Im thinking about putting up a flag antenna for 160 and 80 meters. I had an idea that I might build the vertical sections out of some inch copper pipe I have lying around. The horizontal wires would; /archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00025.html (6,770 bytes)
33. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:03:18 -0700; The wiring to your ADSL system is probably acting as a receive antenna for your 160M transmitter. Your best solution is probably common mode ferrite chokes on your computer equipment, and maybe also; /archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00124.html (7,393 bytes)
34. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Jacek Kubiak" <polkram@it.pl>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:17:46 +0200; I play with TB for last 8 years only and always biggest problem for me was "to hear". Tested already several Pennants, K9AY,s, flags, deltas etc. The results never was satisfied. Can someone tell me; /archives//html/Topband/2008-05/msg00033.html (6,896 bytes)
35. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "n4is" <n4is@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:07:40 -0400; Hi Jacek I'm working on receiving antennas for 160m almost 3 years now. Here my resume about what can go wrong with receiving your antenna. Make sure you are listen signal coming from you RX antenna; /archives//html/Topband/2008-05/msg00034.html (8,867 bytes)
36. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Terry Wassell" <k3jt@westco.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:51:50 -0800; I'm looking for the transformer core for a K9AY rx antenna (BN-202-73) or equivalent. I found a website (CWSBYTEMARK.com) but they have a $25 minimum and I only need a couple of the 60 cent cores. If; /archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00001.html (6,722 bytes)
37. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:23:26 +0000; Terry, Universal Amateur Radio in Reynoldsburg, Ohio carries the small Amidon packs of the things for only a few dollars. 73, Dave K8MN _______________________________________________ Topband mailing; /archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00002.html (6,842 bytes)
38. Re: Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Luis Mansutti IV3PRK" <luisprk@tin.it>; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:53:43 +0200; Terry, Amidon accepts also SMALL orders sales@amidoncorp.com This was my last order on October 29, 2007: -- Dear Sirs, Could you please accept this SMALL order ? Quantity Part number Unit price Total; /archives//html/Topband/2008-08/msg00003.html (8,143 bytes)
39. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Anton Moehammad <moehanton@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:56:28 +0800 (SGT); Hello all, I am looking for a sugestion for an antenna in starting in 160 the posible antenna to erect just between L with 1/4 wave with many ground wire 3 m from ground or inverted V antenna which o; /archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00105.html (7,284 bytes)
40. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Jeff" <w7jw@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:52:08 -0500; This ground is not a stake in the ground at the end of the wire, Jim Brown wrote in reply: That is NOT a good thing. Don't do that! You want no coupling to your transmit antenna. Disconnect it and dr; /archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00245.html (7,982 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]