Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"T\"\s+or\s+Inverted\s+L\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"T\"\s+or\s+Inverted\s+L\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: ae5x@juno.com (John AE5X); Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:53:41 -0500; Good morning, In narrowing my choices of a 160m antenna, I've come to the conclusion that I only have room for either an Inverted L or a "T". ON4UN's book says that the inverted L radiates a high ang; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00198.html (8,439 bytes)
2. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:43:19 +0000; You can vary the length of the T to work for any height. Always go for maximum vertical component whichever one you decide on. The L has a slight directivity advantage over the T for a given height,; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00199.html (8,963 bytes)
3. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: k8do@email.msn.com (k8do); Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:53:37 -0500; Well John... dimensions available... I would not get my calculator overheated trying to assemble a designer antenna knowing that the antenna will be too short to resonate whatever I do... I would sim; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00200.html (8,512 bytes)
4. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: Marty" <n9se@home.com (Marty); Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:52:52 -0000; This is an interesting topic which gets me thinking... I have a 72' Trylon freestanding tower with a KT34xa on top. Would I be better off shunt feeding the tower for 160/80 or should I use the tower; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00203.html (7,872 bytes)
5. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: VY2MGY@IDIRECT.COM (VY2MGY); Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 08:38:13 -0000; Hi John et al I thought about the same thing and decided to use an Inverted L here because when I compete or ragchew on 160 I want the horizontal radiation for NVIS work out to a few 100 miles but I; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00206.html (8,336 bytes)
6. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: herbs@vitelcom.net (Herbert Schoenbohm); Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:45:20 -0400; Marty, Shunt feed and don't even think about the inverted L. The benefits from the top hat not interacting with the beam are worth it alone. A 72 foot tower with a KT-34 are potentially a dream TX an; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00208.html (8,351 bytes)
7. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 22:03:17 -0500; Hi John, Tee top is about 70 percent each side of an inverted L. So if you put 60 foot vertical and were looking at 70 foot horizontal for resonance, try 50 foot on each side. That should get you clo; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00211.html (8,595 bytes)
8. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin); Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 22:18:19 -0500; Dear OM, The KT34XA has all insulated elements. The top loading is from the boom and coupling from feed line to driven elements. If you are not going to mess with grounding the reflector and third di; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00215.html (8,332 bytes)
9. Topband: "T" or Inverted L? (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 23:46:27 +0100; K8GG: The boom doesn't make the element thicker because it is not a part of the element being located below. The strap size is what changes the equivalent diameter of the antenna element but actually; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00228.html (8,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]