Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"T\"\s+Antenna\s+VS\s+30m\s+high\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"T\"\s+Antenna\s+VS\s+30m\s+high\s+vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: "T" Antenna VS 30m high vertical (score: 1): Author: "ik0yvv\@libero\.it" <ik0yvv@libero.it>; Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:38:48 +0200; Hello All, As in each summer ideas to improve the low bands antennas are going to become real work. Now i'm using an 18m vertical with 2 slope wires (each 10m long and with an angle of about 45° ...i; /archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00118.html (8,366 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: "T" Antenna VS 30m high vertical (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:18:04 -0500; IK0YVV wrote: "Looking on the Low band bible by ON4UN and modelling the 30m vertical with eznec it seems that the antenna i'm using now has a better efficency of the 30m one." .... I don't get the sa; /archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00124.html (9,521 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: "T" Antenna VS 30m high vertical (score: 1): Author: GEORGE WALLNER <gwallner@the-beach.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:10:14 -0400; Marco, I was facing the same problem: had to get rid of my top wires for mechanical reasons. First I tried a 31 meter tall vertical fed via a 20 uH inductor. It worked but not as well as what I had b; /archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00127.html (8,255 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]