Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"Magnetic\"\s+loops\s+vs\.\s+pseudo\-Brewster\s+angle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+\"Magnetic\"\s+loops\s+vs\.\s+pseudo\-Brewster\s+angle\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: "Magnetic" loops vs. pseudo-Brewster angle (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:45:32 -0500; ON4UN's "Low Band DXing", 3rd Edition On page 7-54, picture 7-71 is titled "Vertical and horizontal radiation pattern of a small magnetic loop erected in a plane perpendicular to the ground (classic; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00090.html (6,986 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: "Magnetic" loops vs. pseudo-Brewster angle (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:04:33 -0500; No. It cannot be so. Magnetic loops are no different than any other antenna. As a matter of fact, about 1/10th wavelength from a small magnetic loop the predominant field is the ELECTRIC field. So t; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00091.html (8,322 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]