Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+vertical\s+vs\s+horiz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+vertical\s+vs\s+horiz\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: vertical vs horiz (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 07:14:01 -0500; My results agree with Milt's. I've been making tests on 160 since last spring with a 250 ft high dipole. That antenna eventually evolved into a 2 element phased array, selectable east, west, or as a; /archives//html/Topband/1999-03/msg00022.html (7,846 bytes)
2. TopBand: vertical vs horiz (score: 1): Author: csus04@lmpsil02.comm.mot.com (Raymond Dave-CSUS04); Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:49:07 -0600; I agree with Tom's assessment. I have an elevated quarter wave vertical with three radials attached. While not perfect, it does really well. The past two mornings I have not been able to work C21ZM n; /archives//html/Topband/1999-03/msg00023.html (7,540 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]