Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+soil\s+conductivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+soil\s+conductivity\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye); Date: Wed, 25 Mar 98 22:59:32 EST; KM1H said> Very Poor Soil, I would estimate 1 mS/M. K0HA said he might see 1000 mS/M when real wet I'm planning to measure things here. Are there better ways to measure soil conductivity than the inf; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00477.html (7,426 bytes)
2. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 07:00:52 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi All, That may be true for ground rods only driven near the surface, at dc, or at VHF, but certainly not for what everyone has been talking about. The skin depth is at; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00479.html (8,910 bytes)
3. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 10:04:55 EST; Tom that agrees right on the nose with the ARRL Antenna Manual ( 17th Edition here) ground conductivity chart. Most of GA is rated at 4 mS/m on the chart wheras my QTH is listed as 1 mS/m. Would you; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00484.html (8,593 bytes)
4. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: W8AV@aol.com (W8AV); Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:56:30 EST; << I'm planning to measure things here. Are there better ways to measure soil conductivity than the info in the ARRL Antenna Book (by W2FMI and W2FNQ originally in 4/78 and 3/81 QST)? Looks like a si; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00491.html (8,519 bytes)
5. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 06:19:50 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> It would certainly be much better than sticking two rods in the very top layer and measuring the surface at near-dc frequencies. 73, Tom W8JI w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com -- FAQ o; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00494.html (7,600 bytes)
6. TopBand: soil conductivity (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 11:46:56 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> Yeah, I get a chuckle when I hear the locals grousing about how poor the dry desert ground is for RF. I'm quite happy with this earth compared to my 3 milliSiemens north; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00506.html (9,607 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]