Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+sloping\s+parasitic\s+array\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+sloping\s+parasitic\s+array\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: sloping parasitic array (score: 1): Author: jon.zaimes@dol.net (jon zaimes); Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 21:44:20 -0500 (EST); I'm planning on erecting 128 feet of Rohn 25 as a vertical radiator, with ropes supporting vertical parasitic elements with sloping top-hats as described in ON4UN's book. (3 elements with Reflector,; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00509.html (7,036 bytes)
2. TopBand: sloping parasitic array (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 16:51:38 EST; "What difference will it make whether I series-feed the tower or shunt-feed it, if any? == I modeled 3 configurations of the 128' vertical without any parasitic elements in the field: 1) Series fed 2; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00512.html (8,234 bytes)
3. TopBand: sloping parasitic array (score: 1): Author: john.devoldere@innet.be (John Devoldere (ON4UN)); Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 22:12:31 +0100; Isn't that what I said without modelling ? I think it is dangerous to base all our knowledge exclusively on the results of modelling! The technical guys should know the answer to such question withou; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00513.html (10,901 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]