- 1. TopBand: quad vs. yagi @ low height (score: 1)
- Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net)
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:03:39 -0700
- Esteemed Reflectees, (I know this is not topband specific topic but I know it's readers are well versed in antenna theory hence the addition of them to this email) I am going to put a fixed wire "bea
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00069.html (7,892 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: quad vs. yagi @ low height (score: 1)
- Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net)
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:06:02 -0700
- Correction: Should have read switch in seperate driven elements and sets of directors? Sorry. Lane KM3G --Original Message-- From: zeitler@ibm.net <zeitler@ibm.net> To: towertalk@contesting.com <towe
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00070.html (9,080 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: quad vs. yagi @ low height (score: 1)
- Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 08:29:55 EDT
- Well gosh,17 meters isn't topband, but what the heck... Given the very low height figures you quote I would install it as a yagi arrangement, but hang it with the elements vertical instead of horizon
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00075.html (7,428 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu