Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+dipole\/vert\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+dipole\/vert\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: dipole/vert (score: 1): Author: Peter.Chadwick@gpsemi.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 12:38:50 -0000; Adding to K1ZM's comments, on 40 m, my sloping dipoles often receive VK better than my horizontal full wave dipole by about 1 S point, while VK receives 1 S point better when the dipole is used on tx; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00457.html (6,934 bytes)
2. TopBand: dipole/vert (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (W2pm@aol.com); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 08:05:43 -0500 (EST); << hat price reciprocity? (in the ionosphere, that is) >> Another case of different SN ratios at different QTHS .. 73 Pete -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@c; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00458.html (6,770 bytes)
3. TopBand: dipole/vert (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 09:28:36 EST; Jeff, Peter, etc Why not consider transmitting on both antennas at the same time? I did this back in 1987-89 and it was extremely effective in 160M contests. The amps were each a pair of 3-500Z's and; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00461.html (8,275 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]