Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+contest\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: contest (score: 1): Author: bazley at iinet.net.au (Michael Bazley); Date: Sun Jan 26 17:33:59 2003; Hi All, Except for S9 QRN good cndx to USA both days but working into Europe was difficult. Thanks for all the QSO's. Best Dx D4B who had great ears, long haul from here.Contest much better with 48 h; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00223.html (6,228 bytes)
2. Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: jmata@nil.fut.es (EA3VY-JOSE MATA GARRIGA); Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 12:55:53 +0100; Dear fellows: I will be next night (saturday to sunday) looking specially for WEST trying to answer calling stations across the band. Cluster spots will be wellcome to aid in search. Jose EA3VY -- FA; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00046.html (6,566 bytes)
3. TopBand: contest (score: 1): Author: Wb2lmv@aol.com (Wb2lmv@aol.com); Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 00:19:58 EST; Where are all the W7's and W6's, we have all worked each other here on the left side. 73 de Glenn wb2lmv -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Admi; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00042.html (6,464 bytes)
4. TopBand: contest (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 14:38:48 -0800; Glenn, Not sure how many were active here in the S.W. but I was operating with N6KI using the call NR6R. We had around 360 Qs by 0800 zulu. Lots of east coast/mid-west calls. I thought condx were exc; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00052.html (7,661 bytes)
5. TopBand: Contest (score: 1): Author: ilmo.anttila@qualisys.inet.fi (Ilmo Anttila); Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 11:39:21 +0200; Hi topbanders! Contest was quite OK! It was difficult with JA's and NA because of aurora. NOAA/POES-estimate level was abt 6 Only big boys from Japan did come through like JA4LXY, JA7NI and couple of; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00190.html (7,065 bytes)
6. TopBand: Contest (score: 1): Author: vk3ew@rint.com.au (David VK3EW); Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 02:56:36 +1000; Hmmmmmm.... Tnx to everyone for the replies but I was sure it was the ARRL SSB 160 Contest But I can see now it MUST have ben the CQ 160 SSb in Feb 1997 Can someone confirm this please. Im Confused t; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00142.html (6,655 bytes)
7. TopBand: contest (score: 1): Author: n2tnn@ifu.net (Dean Marzocca); Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1996 15:21:18 -0500; I just jumped into the contest running 5 watts here in NJ. How late do we go tonight? and what logging program is set up to handle this arrl contest?? 72/73, Dean, NJ, N2TNN, QRP-L # 560 -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00106.html (6,368 bytes)
8. Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Joe Wilkowski <k8fc@k8fc.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 10:46:58 -0700; Holy Cow ! Holy Cow! and Holy Cow! What a treat it was to be on topband this morning. Having been a former resident of Western NY where propagation on 160 was pretty good for us, I moved to southern; /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00074.html (7,925 bytes)
9. Topband: contest (score: 1): Author: "Michael Bazley" <vk6hd@iinet.net.au>; Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 08:36:00 +0800; If you want to make it a "DX" contest then more focus has to be on DX. Use grid squares and make long distance contacts count and short distance ones, say less than 3000KM/s worth nothing...for me 30; /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00440.html (6,684 bytes)
10. Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Merv Schweigert <k9fd@flex.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:09:54 -1000; Boy the alligators were out in force again eh? There were some very good conditions and tons of good signals on the band, as always many who must have basement beverages on the receiver. Not that I a; /archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00252.html (7,204 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 05:17:12 -0800 (PST); Propagation... Well at least that's what I hope it is. EU was pounding in here Friday night early, but from the sounds of it, even the Top Band heavies were having some difficulty making the contact; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00001.html (7,445 bytes)
12. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: WD8DSB@aol.com; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:40:25 EST; I used to think the reason big guns did not hear me were due to their running directional receiving antennas, but I now suspect the majority of the problem has to do with the very narrow receive fil; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00003.html (7,419 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: "Charles W. Shaw" <chasshaw@leaco.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:29:21 +0000; At 13:17 2/1/2010, Julius Fazekas wrote: Propagation... Well at least that's what I hope it is. EU was pounding in here Friday night early, but from the sounds of it, even the Top Band heavies were h; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00004.html (9,141 bytes)
14. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Henk Remijn PA5KT <pa5kt@remijn.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:26:20 +0100; Experience from the EU side: During first night conditions were not very good, but normal, I did hear Midwest and West coast USA but not workable, europeans and East coast USA were strong the whole n; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00006.html (8,731 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:38:38 -0500; 20 over 9 and cant hear dozens of people calling wazzup? WB8DSB replied: running directional receiving antennas, but I now suspect the majority of the problem has to do with the very narrow receive f; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00008.html (8,644 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:34:38 -0800 (PST); [snip] I run a 600 Hz roofing filter in my R-4C, and either a 250 Hz or 125 Hz last IF filter (all by Sherwood Engineering). I don't hear anyone that's not in my passband, no matter what their signa; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00010.html (8,792 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:56:53 -0500; I concur. I admit to using very narrow a filtering when in a contest, sometimes going down to 50Hz but when I do, I am not the one doing the calling. Most stations reply when I respond to their CQ s; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00011.html (8,958 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:23:01 -0800 (PST); Judging by some of the eQSLs I've seen so far, more than a few thought they were working one station and actually are in another log. This seemed to be much worse below 1830 versus above say 1850. T; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00017.html (9,153 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:29:06 -0800 (PST); If it helps, I'm in EM86... Reciprocal would have definitely been SWEET. I'm envious of all of the stations worked who I never even heard... and some of them were worked by folks in Tennessee, of cou; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00018.html (11,971 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: Contest (score: 1): Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:39:54 -0500; Most modern transceivers actually do transmit CW on a carrier frequency precisely locked to the pitch of the local sidetone chosen by the operator. Unfortunately, many of those same transceivers don'; /archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00020.html (10,131 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]