- 1. TopBand: Wire FENCES and Ground Mounted Verticals ... (score: 1)
- Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy W. Cox)
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:24:15 -0800
- To our large database of "them in the know": Here's my query .... Has anyone (public/private/government/etc) done any studies of the 'effects' of what exactly happens to the pattern of a single, or a
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00179.html (8,269 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Wire FENCES and Ground Mounted Verticals ... (score: 1)
- Author: dfi@cyberhighway.net (Scott Cowling)
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 15:43:23 -0700 (MST)
- Billy, My vote is for the 8' elevated vertical. If the fence is below your radials, it will have little effect on your pattern. As I stated in an earlier post, I beleive that 4 elevated radials is as
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00180.html (8,343 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: Wire FENCES and Ground Mounted Verticals ... (score: 1)
- Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 18:26:12 -0700
- To: <topband@contesting.com> The horizontal fence interacts very little with the vertical. It might make the fence charger quieter (or noisier). It won't do much one way or the other for the antenna
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00185.html (8,762 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu