Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Wire\s+FENCES\s+and\s+Ground\s+Mounted\s+Verticals\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Wire FENCES and Ground Mounted Verticals ... (score: 1)
Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy W. Cox)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 14:24:15 -0800
To our large database of "them in the know": Here's my query .... Has anyone (public/private/government/etc) done any studies of the 'effects' of what exactly happens to the pattern of a single, or a
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00179.html (8,269 bytes)

2. TopBand: Wire FENCES and Ground Mounted Verticals ... (score: 1)
Author: dfi@cyberhighway.net (Scott Cowling)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 15:43:23 -0700 (MST)
Billy, My vote is for the 8' elevated vertical. If the fence is below your radials, it will have little effect on your pattern. As I stated in an earlier post, I beleive that 4 elevated radials is as
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00180.html (8,343 bytes)

3. TopBand: Wire FENCES and Ground Mounted Verticals ... (score: 1)
Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 18:26:12 -0700
To: <topband@contesting.com> The horizontal fence interacts very little with the vertical. It might make the fence charger quieter (or noisier). It won't do much one way or the other for the antenna
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00185.html (8,762 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu