Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Vertical\s+V\s+Dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Vertical\s+V\s+Dipole\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Vertical V Dipole (score: 1): Author: sire@omen.com.au (Steve Ireland); Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 21:46:30 +0800; Just a short note, mainly in reply to Paul, VK3AJJ's posting. The most important comparison I make when I put up an new 160m antenna is how well it stacks up against Mike VK6HD's signal with his inve; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00402.html (11,724 bytes)
2. TopBand: Vertical V Dipole (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 17:01:01 EST; On Sun, 22 Mar 1998 21:46:30 +0800 Steve Ireland <sire@omen.com.au> writes: Steve, do you know what your ground conductivity is? Just what is ur QTH like? Do you have a theory why a low V works bette; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00411.html (7,641 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]