Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Topband\s+\-\s+Proximity\s+to\s+trees\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Topband\s+\-\s+Proximity\s+to\s+trees\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Topband - Proximity to trees (score: 1): Author: wes@prysm.net (Wes Attaway); Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 23:44:26 -0600; I use a wire vertical that is suspended from a pine tree limb 92' above ground. The tree is 120', or so, tall. The antenna is about 3 or 4 feet from the trunk. On 160, the antenna operates as a 90' t; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00255.html (7,641 bytes)
2. TopBand: Topband - Proximity to trees (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 09:43:54 -0500; The primary problem would be the nearfield coupling via the electric field to the tree. It's like a "capacitance problem" in this case, rather than a radiation field problem. The problem would be wor; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00258.html (8,406 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]