Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+N4KG\s+160\s+system\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+N4KG\s+160\s+system\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: N4KG 160 system ? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell); Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 08:13:10 EST; Hi Steve - With only 4 radials, I expect that a few more would improve efficiency and reduce the feedpoint impedance. NN4T/WA4CTA and I both observed a reduction in impedance as radials were added fr; /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00021.html (9,946 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: N4KG 160 system ? (score: 1): Author: w77kxb@juno.com (William Harris); Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 09:35:19 EST; Good morning Tom: FYI, there is an interesting article in the arrl ANTENNA COMPENDIUM, Vol 2, Pg 42: "A Multiband Loaded Counterpoise for Vertical Antennas." The author, H. L. Ley, N3CDR also gave re; /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00023.html (7,339 bytes)
3. TopBand: Re: N4KG 160 system ? (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 12:59:03 -0500 (EST); Hi Bill, First a point of humor. I fully expect in a few years the real truth will come out. No radials are better than 120 radials, and the less radials we use the better our signals will be. The sh; /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00028.html (8,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]