Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+vs\s+T\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+Inverted\-L\s+vs\s+T\s+Antennas\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: Inverted-L vs T Antennas (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell); Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 15:15:27 EST; The HALF-WAVE T-TOP ANTENNA described by VK3APN (approximately 1/2 wavelength from bottom of the T to each end at the top and fed at the top) will exhibit a high impedance (and there high voltage) at; /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00009.html (7,568 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: Inverted-L vs T Antennas (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 18:08:47 -0500 (EST); It will still be a vertical radiator, since the current in the flat top is out of phase and maximum near the intersection of the vertical wire. Assuming a resonable ground system (perhaps ten, twenty; /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00010.html (8,319 bytes)
3. TopBand: Re: Inverted-L vs T Antennas (score: 1): Author: pnesbit@melbpc.org.au (Peter Nesbit VK3APN); Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 13:14:33 +1000; Hi Kristinn! Your idea is simple and appealing, however the performance of such an antenna is likely to be disappointing because: 1. high RF currents will flow into your rig, house wiring, microphone; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00001.html (12,430 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]