Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+A\s+really\s+quiet\s+location\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Re\:\s+A\s+really\s+quiet\s+location\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Re: A really quiet location (score: 1): Author: pnesbit@melbpc.org.au (P&V Nesbit); Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 10:33:56 +1000; It's amazing how often you hear of low antennas giving better SNR, and not just for brief periods around sunrise, as discussed (and explained) here several weeks ago. How is this so, when low angle D; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00046.html (8,701 bytes)
2. TopBand: Re: A really quiet location (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:35:44 -0400; Hi Peter, Great answer! I never thought about broadband IMD generating hash in a receiver front end. That doesn't seem to be a problem with my 751A's. I wondered the same thing myself, why so many pe; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00051.html (7,407 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]