Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Proximity\s+to\s+Trees\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Proximity\s+to\s+Trees\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@wolfenet.com (Ward Silver); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 07:24:29 -0800 (PST); Aside from bad puns about trunk lines and branch circuits... My inverted-L relies on a stout redwood (these aren't trees, they're wooden pyramids) to support the vertical wire. At the feed point, the; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00168.html (8,085 bytes)
2. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:16:34 -0500; Ward.... tsk, tsk, tsk.... Such compulsive behavior!..... stay in your chair... watch the weather out the window.. pet the dog... if you aren't going to move that 24,000 miles of absorbent dirt/rock/; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00185.html (7,804 bytes)
3. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 19:40:09 EST; Many years ago W7EL wrote a comment about tree sucking RF; he thought it was important but never followed thru with a study that I am aware of. Dont confuse with Tree Hugging Wackos. My own expeiment; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00216.html (9,519 bytes)
4. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: jherman@hawaii.edu (Jeffrey Herman); Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 16:53:38 -1000; The military has done extensive studies regarding RF absorption by foliage. 20 years ago while in Coast Guard Radioman school I recall some instruction regarding this; my memory is a bit dim but what; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00219.html (8,227 bytes)
5. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: danmec@inet.uni-c.dk (MEC); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 11:07:05 +0100 (MET); I have only an inverted L-antenna per W1BB on 160, and it is slung over a tree. The vertical part is about 24 meters, the rest is sloping down on the other side. The feedpoint is at another tree 8 me; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00223.html (8,114 bytes)
6. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: nx1g@top.monad.net (Craig Clark); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 08:47:46 -0600; "Don't sweat the small stuff" I remember this too from US Army Signal School, fall 1974. However, the key factor was frequency. Since most platoon and company communications is VHF, this was the freq; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00227.html (11,622 bytes)
7. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: w3iwu@voicenet.com (Herb Spoonts); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 17:29:43 -0500 (EST); For any errant VHFers who live here, THE VHF/UHF DX BOOK edited by G3SEK, published for the RSGB and available from the ARRL, contains an absorption(db) vs frequency (30-3000 mHz) chart for foliage.; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00232.html (9,067 bytes)
8. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 21:54:06 EST; On Thu, 12 Dec 1996 16:53:38 -1000 Jeffrey Herman <jherman@hawaii.edu> writes: I will take that a step further. The military for at least 2 decades has used trees as the actual antenna. There is equi; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00236.html (8,823 bytes)
9. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 09:29:34 -0500; It seems to me a tree would be a useless antenna. I've never observed trees to affect FS readings except at VHF and microwave. The attenuation is greater as frequency increases. Roy Lewallen W7EL sai; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00240.html (9,300 bytes)
10. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 11:12:55 -0500; Maybe I wasn't too clear on the bamboo - wire situation. When I used the wire vertical the bamboo pole was used as a support, where the wires first were just taped to the bamboo. They were three wire; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00259.html (9,751 bytes)
11. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 08:25:54 -0500; << What is the special NEC program used for trees, Elm-nec?? Well yeah, actually... but it only works for slippery elm.... cellphone in the truck, with external antennas, are weak but useable... In t; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00272.html (8,387 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]