Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Parasitic\s+Array\s+using\s+loaded\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Parasitic\s+Array\s+using\s+loaded\s+towers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Parasitic Array using loaded towers (score: 1): Author: sears@rell.com (sears@rell.com); Date: Wed, 1 Jan 1997 11:56:46 -0600; Tree, I use a parasitic array on 160M. I have 4 134' verticals spaced 85' from a 130' tower located in the center. Each vertical is in the corner of a square. The verticals are in the normal directio; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00015.html (11,088 bytes)
2. TopBand: Parasitic Array using loaded towers (score: 1): Author: larrytx@co.intel.com (LarryX Tyree contractor for brentc); Date: Tue, 31 Dec 96 14:29:18 PST; Well - the ongoing saga of "My Two Towers" has gone into a new phase (no pun intended). I have been using two towers spaced 105 feet on receive using an ANC-4 to adjust the phasing. They are in line; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00569.html (9,271 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]