Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+MFJ\s+Tuners\,\s+etc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+MFJ\s+Tuners\,\s+etc\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: MFJ Tuners, etc (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 01 Jan 1997 12:39:54 EST; Tom, W8JI, made some excellent points in his posting. What he failed to mention is that MFJ is his employer. Consulting or otherwise; they pay the freight and have for several years. The Oren Elliott; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00016.html (10,936 bytes)
2. TopBand: MFJ Tuners, etc (score: 1): Author: danmec@inet.uni-c.dk (MEC); Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 00:08:47 +0100 (MET); 3KW. As Dentron progressed up the power curve with the I once had ( before relocating to OZ) the MLA 2500/3KWtuner combination. On 160- the ATU broke down. The switch was under-rated for the current; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00021.html (7,677 bytes)
3. TopBand: MFJ Tuners, etc (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:37:55 -0500; Hi Carl, My goal was to improve the understanding of power ratings, not to make you or any other manufacturer "happy or unhappy". My main point was the tuner rating "system" used BY ALL MANUFACTURERS; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00046.html (11,497 bytes)
4. TopBand: MFJ Tuners, etc (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 16:38:04 -0500; Unlike the "3 KW Dentron", the 1500 watt 80 meter up (1000 watt 160 meter rated) ATR-15 used more expensive lexan supports, heavier inductor wire, more capacitance on 160, a #8 coil for ten meters th; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00047.html (7,841 bytes)
5. TopBand: MFJ Tuners, etc (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 19:58:48 EST; today, and will remain so until everyone demands a change in and Hi again Tom, here we go with phase 2. My original reply was in response to 4X1AD's MFJ query which was on many reflectors, not just 1; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00053.html (12,945 bytes)
6. TopBand: MFJ Tuners, etc (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 13:59:36 -0500; I found the W8JIT original post to be interesting, technically good, and I did not get the impression of bias, either in the comparison of the weak and strong points of the various circuit arrangemen; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00067.html (7,257 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]