Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+HEARD\s+better\s+on\s+xmit\s+antenna\,\s+propagation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+HEARD\s+better\s+on\s+xmit\s+antenna\,\s+propagation\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna, propagation (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:05:36 -0500 (EST); << I think some of the odd signal strength behavior is due to multiple paths open at once, maybe close to each other in azimuth. Since the paths are so long, their signal strengths vary considerably,; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00378.html (10,343 bytes)
2. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna, propagation (score: 1): Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com); Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 11:55:21 -0500 (EST); Yuri's comments are very astute... I have tried discussing this with some of the locals, and nearly got lynched in the process.... The minute I took the position that propagation does _not_ involve 1; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00384.html (8,076 bytes)
3. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna, propagation (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:43:05 EST; Yeah Denny...I bought into Yuri's ideas 10 years ago since they seemed to fit real life observations and explained an awful lot to this old man. I'll let the professional authors continue to write th; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00392.html (7,809 bytes)
4. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna, propagation (score: 1): Author: kl7y@alaska.net (Dan Robbins); Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 21:35:40 -0900 (AKST); To: <topband@contesting.com> Relocatable-Over-the-Horizon Radar (operated at HF) and we always got earth returns unless there was a blanketing E layer. At times we printed nice color pictures of the; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00402.html (9,870 bytes)
5. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna, propagation (score: 1): Author: W8JITom@aol.com (W8JITom@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 03:04:28 -0500 (EST); If I was there I would have foamed also. Power loss is largely affected by current density, losses are I *squared* R. When charge movement is spread out over a large area, losses are greatly reduced; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00403.html (10,235 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]