Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Gads\,\s+weird\s+science\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TopBand\:\s+Gads\,\s+weird\s+science\s+again\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Gads, weird science again (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1998 01:30:13 -0400; Hi Bill, It sounds like you compared some reasonably efficient antennas. L,B and E would indicate about 3 dB down or so for your vertical, so that might be about one S unit. I hope you kept your test; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00015.html (8,385 bytes)
2. TopBand: Gads, weird science again (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 02 Aug 1998 04:40:32 -0400; By they way, my title change was not a reflection of your message or anyone else's Bill, but rather my view of what this topic generally turns into rather quickly! I simply thought it fit better than; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00017.html (8,538 bytes)
3. TopBand: Gads, weird science again (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 10:53:15 EDT; << 1.) There isn't one of us who can measure polarity or wave angle on 160. It's all just a guess with plenty of opinions and no proof of anything. Because of that, we have no proof the problem is ro; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00051.html (10,143 bytes)
4. TopBand: Gads, weird science again (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 09:25:36 -0400; Hi Yuri, do factor, That is not true Yuri. Polarity is no more "fuzzied" or "wandering around" than wave angle is. The earth and everything around the rod antenna combines to modify the pattern of th; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00061.html (10,848 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]