- 1. TopBand: Coaxial Cable Traps (score: 1)
- Author: gmguerin@voyager.net (George & Marijke Guerin)
- Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 20:59:55 -0400
- Hi Gang: A early in the 1980's some of pre-reflector topbanders had a discussion about traps made out of coaxial cable vs. traps made out of descrete components for multi-band inverted L antennas. Th
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00077.html (7,999 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: Coaxial Cable Traps (score: 1)
- Author: w7iuv@axtek.com (Larry Molitor)
- Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1998 00:58:46 +0100
- George, The coax you want is RG-141 or RG-142, (single or double shield) same size as RG-58. It's amazing stuff. I used to routinely run 1500 watts thru it on 2 mtrs with no problem. On 160 mtrs, I'd
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00081.html (8,114 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: Coaxial Cable Traps (score: 1)
- Author: dbowker@shire.sjv.net (Dave Bowker)
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 12:12:55 -0400
- Manufacturers of coax cable usually specify a minimum bend radius for cables which are to be installed in a fixed bent configuration. If the bend radius is not specifically called out for the particu
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00084.html (7,722 bytes)
- 4. TopBand: Coaxial Cable Traps (score: 1)
- Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 12:01:23 -0400
- Hi Larry, I e-mailed George direct, but perhaps should post something. When you operate coax in a trap, it is VERY lossy. The cable operates at a near infinite SWR! I had to test some traps many year
- /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00093.html (8,467 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu